GOOGLE’S AI OVERVIEW IS GREAT. Ask a specific question and it will give an
accurate, sourced and specific answer.
Not that its sources will answer specifically, however. Asking for the population of the United Kingdom
will give a variable answer depending on which regions it includes. But when I asked Google AI for separate
population figures for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland in the
2001, 2011 and 2021 censuses I got exactly what I wanted and could assemble the
answers into a coherent whole.
I wanted to know what the rates of increase of Muslim and non-Muslim populations
of the UK were. It’s not possible to look
back further than 2001 since the 1991 census didn’t include a figure for religions. This is a pity in a way, since the equivalent
New Zealand figures show that the Islamic attack on New York’s Twin Towers had
a salutary effect on immigration policy.
The annual rate of increase in Muslim population dropped from 10% before
2001 to 5.4% afterwards. Just as
well. The ratio of Muslim growth fell
from a twenty year average of 24 times the non-Muslim growth rate to just under 5 times
post 9/11.
Here's the equivalent growth rate calculations for the United Kingdom:
The phrase “demographic bombing” is dismissed as
conspiratorial but is supported by these statistics. The causes are more diverse, and include the
chaos caused by Islamists in Africa and the Middle East forcing an exodus,
Islam’s telos of global theocracy and the Koranic injunction to migrate in the
cause of Allah (4:100, 8:72-75), and Europe’s Christian moral obligation to give
succour to migrants. The ‘pull’ factor
of Europe’s welfare system mustn’t be underestimated as it forms a major part of
migrant narrative and discourse.
THE SLAUGHTER OF JEWS AT BONDI BEACH got all the publicity it warranted, but as I mentioned in February’s Diary, implicit fear of any mention of “Islam”, the ideology ultimately responsible for this attack, gets off scot-free. Reading through a variety of commentary, the most- reported issue is anti-Semitism followed by gun control, as if they were the principal causes. Given that, the killers could have been extremist Left-wingers or fascistic Right-wingers. But the perpetrators’ names were of the father and son team Sajid and Naveed Akram. A photo of Naveed shows a man of Arabic appearance, with a Muslim name, and who according to GB News had studied religion at the Al-Murad Islamic Institute. Only then does the question of radicalisation arise.
Australia’s News.com got it right, though. PM Anthony Albanese spoke 5022 words in press conferences, interviews and statements in the day after the attack, but did not once say the words “Muslim”, “Islam” or “Islamic extremism”. The PM instead spoke only of anti-Semitism, violent extremism and even twice raised threat of “right wing extremist groups”.
There’s the expected dawah deception, to which The Guardian predictably contributes. The head of the Al-Murad Islamic Institute says that the “Qur’an [5:32]… clearly states that taking one innocent life is like killing all of humanity. This makes it clear that what unfolded yesterday at Bondi is completely forbidden in Islam.” This is ‘tawriya’, lying to the infidel. He omits the bit which says that Allah was addressing the Israelites, not Muslims, and also the bit which says, “unless it be for murder or corruption in the land”, or the next verse which says, “The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed…” It takes little Islamic imagination to think that that is what Israel is doing and Australian Jews are Israelis by proxy. There’s no shortage of instruction in Islam’s religious texts for the actions taken by the Akrams.
This is what ‘globalise the intifada’ means, and the useful idiots chanting the phrase across the West should take some responsibility for the deaths at Bondi. It’s unlikely, though. The ideology that created this mass inculcation of simple minds cares not for consequences, only its goal of the West’s defeat.
Abu Huraira reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: The last hour would not come unless the Muslims will fight against the Jews and the Muslims would kill them until the Jews would hide themselves behind a stone or a tree and a stone or a tree would say: Muslim, or the servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me; come and kill him; but the tree Gharqad would not say, for it is the tree of the Jews. Sahih Muslim 2922.
THE SPECTATOR’S AUSTRALIA EDITION showed concern
for a draft text, source not credited, which defines ‘anti-Muslim hatred’ instead
of Islamophobia. Beyond the normal
restrictions on harm to others, it includes ‘stereotyping…of Muslims as part of
a collective group with set characteristics…” such as the ummah which Muslims
themselves define. There are other phrases, “engaging in prohibited
discrimination where the relevant conduct – including the creation or use of
practices and biases within institutions – is intended to disadvantage Muslims
in public and economic life” which open the door for Muslims to make claims on
relatively specious grounds and have them supported by the state.
As is my wont, I posted an explanatory note, reading,
“Islam’s telos is to bring the world into submission to the will of Allah and
the imposition of sharia law. (Koran
2:193, 9:33, 21:105, 48:28, 61:9 etc.)
The proposed definition is important to ensure that Muslims are not
impeded in their pursuit of this goal.
It will allow entry into civic, governance, educational, interfaith
advocacy, finance, think tank, military, and NGO agencies, as well as
Australian arms of international agencies.
By focussing on common interests, such people will have increasing power
and influence on outcomes, an essential step in Islam’s progress.
“This
is what conquest looks like.”
To conserve the energy of those who might read this, I will quote chapter and verse from the Koran, Pickthall translation.
2:193 - And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrong-doers.
9:33 – He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the Religion of Truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religion, however much the idolaters may be averse.
21:105 – And verily we have written in the Scripture, after the Reminder: My righteous slaves will inherit the earth:
48:28 – He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the religion of truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religion. And Allah sufficeth as a Witness.
61:9 - He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the religion of truth, that He may make it conqueror of all religion however much idolaters may be averse.
A PREDICTABLE OUTCOME OF EVERY ISLAMIST TERRROR ATTACK IN
THE WEST is that Muslim religious commentators will pop up to offer vacuous variations
of “Islam is a religion of peace.” Of
all religions, only Islam needs to say this because it is self-evidently
extremely violent. However, Islam
permits its acolytes to lie to non-Muslims (called tawriya) in the hope
that some will believe them, and astonishingly, they do!
There’s a verse in the Koran which gets repeatedly misquoted, again in the hope
that simple minds will take it seriously.
The verse is 5:32, from a later Medinan chapter where Allah castigates Jews and Christians for twisting the
revelations they received. The
part that is misquoted is “If anyone kills
a person, it would be as if he killed the whole people: and if anyone saved a
life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people."
But according to Saudi Arabia’s official The Noble Qur’an, the
actual verse reads, “Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel
that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread
mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone
saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed,
there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even
then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits ( e.g. by doing
oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allah by committing
the major sins) in the land!”
Allah says this to subtly reproach the Jews for the plot they had hatched to
assassinate Muhammad and some of his companions. Analysing this verse phrase by phrase, we
have, “Because of that” which was the murder of Abel by Cain regarded as a
rejection of the sin of Cain, manifest in the Jews, of killing another. “We ordained for the Children of Israel” – Allah is specifically
addressing the Jews and NOT Muslims. “…if
anyone killed a person… it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it
would be as if he saved the life of all mankind” is a quote from the
Talmud. But the Koran adds, “…not in
retaliation for murder…” which is the eye-for-an-eye retaliation common then and now, known legally as lex talionis. It is a get-out clause to justify murder by
Muslims. It should be noted, however, that
some jurists consider this also applies to Muslims shedding the blood of
Muslims. “…or to spread mischief in the
land…”
Mischief is often translated as corruption or villainy and refers to war against the righteous order established by, and the responsibility of, the Islamic state governing the land. The Arabic term is fasad fil-ardh which carries the death penalty for anyone who threatens to undermine authority or destabilise the state. It includes not going to the mosque, all criticism of Islam, Muhammad or the Koran, sedition, treason, apostasy, atheism, terrorism, piracy, rape, adultery and homosexuality, also churches and the possession of Bibles. There is a great fear in Islam of a return to jahiliyyah, a pre-Islamic state of barbarism caused by fitna, the acts of mischief.
The following verses, 5:33-34, removes any claim to peace. “The only reward of those who make war upon Allah and His messenger and strive after corruption in the land will be that they will be killed or crucified, or have their hands and feet on alternate sides cut off, or will be expelled out of the land. Such will be their degradation in the world, and in the Hereafter theirs will be an awful doom; Save those who repent before ye overpower them. For know that Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. Pickthall tr.
Islam obliges Muslims to kill those it considers a threat to Islam. That’s why 15 Jews died on Sunday 21st of December; the Akrams were doing their duty. Australia does not need gun control. Australia needs Islam control.
Sources: http://www.islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=5&verse=27&to=34;
WikiIslam.net - https://wikiislam.net/wiki/If_Anyone_Slays_a_Person_(Qur%27an_5:32)
The Critical Qur’an by Robert Spencer. Post Hill Press 2021
No comments:
Post a Comment