Taking an overview, it seems clear that millennia ago
northern European people had to develop robust food planning and weather
protection skills to cope with the seasons.
This led to a highly adaptive and creative culture throughout Europe. Britain’s rise to become the globally
dominant power in the last millennium had a global effect in setting English as
the language, infrastructure, educational, governance and legal foundations of
much of the world. The diminution of
Christianity after the Reformation and the Renaissance, the rise of humanism,
and the creation of the Westphalian nation-state set in place the European
model as the most successful civilisation the world has ever seen, culminating
in the ‘Golden Age of Economics’ from the end of the depression to the
mid-1970s. Opposition to this was, for
centuries, sporadic and local. This
changed in the 20th century as new globalist movements gained
force. Two world wars ended Britain’s
economic strength and created moral reverberations throughout Europe. Communism unified disaffection with the status
quo, and after its failure at a national level, recruited of a new constituency
of victimhood through universities and media.
The unavoidable imposition of the nation-state model on the Middle East
exacerbated a continuing resentment.
Then a confluence of events – Europe’s colonial
immigration, Middle East oil revenues, Islamic resurgence, neo-liberal
economics which increased income and asset disparity, and the Marxists’ new
electorate of the self-identified oppressed – united the direction and moral
certainty of these global movements’ resentment against a perceived common
enemy, that of European cultural hegemony and its liberal democratic
capitalism. This antipathy took various
forms – anti-white, anti-male, anti-democracy, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic,
anti-conservative and anti-Western.
Neo-Marxism formed the ideological backbone, enlisting anti-Semites with
the newly-minted Palestinian narrative, feminists with their antagonism to
existing male power structures and support for the victim class, Left-wing
parties by side-lining traditionalists and supporting globalists, and by
engaging with another major anti-Western ideology, Islam.
Communism’s history meant that neo-Marxism could never gain electoral
strength. Its former partly-unwitting,
partly-unwilling partner Labour and its Left-wing equivalents across the
Western world had undermined itself and was becoming electorally
marginalised. Neo-Marxism needed a
committed, united, popular, globalist, and anti-Western group to step up to the
electoral plate, and it found this in Islam.
It had to ignore their widely separate agendas and it had to manage the
negative perceptions of Islam’s violent supremacism. In what I predict will be seen as a masterful
and permanent reorientation of the Western Weltanschauung, it has ostracised
opposition and succeeded in putting in place the process for the destruction of
Western civilisation.
It seems there is an imperative in humanity for catharsis. The bigger the society, the bigger the
cataclysm that produces it. Globalism is
preparing us for just such a cataclysm.
