On the face of it, the cause of the deaths
of Cindy George and her three children in Ashburton in early July 2015 lay
between rank stupidity and abject ignorance.
The facts as known indicate George left a car running in a closed garage
with the interior door opened, and they died of carbon monoxide poisoning. It may be that given it was a cold winter’s
night she kept the door open to use the heat from the car’s exhaust to warm the
house.
Poison experts waxed specific on carbon
monoxide being odourless and an insidious killer, which while true wasn’t
relevant, since it was the car’s exhaust fumes that killed the family and these
are certainly not odourless. Indeed they
are quite unpleasant, which makes one wonder why a mother would permit such
fumes to pervade the house. The press seemed to make excuses for George’s
actions and could have been exhibiting a form of racial prejudice, mitigating her
responsibility on the grounds of
primitivism given that Mrs George was a Cook Islander and perhaps unfamiliar
with both cold climates and car exhausts.
That
four bodies lay for up to six days without being found no doubt weighs heavily
on the conscience of her community and will contribute to expressions of grief.
While there is little known evidential support,
there could be another explanation for these four deaths. The police will conjecture that for reasons
of insanity or revenge George chose to kill her children then herself. Were it found to be the case, this essay
would have to be deleted as too many points would be irrelevant.
Tweets
and Responses
Beyond the deaths and their cause, the
accident raised a curious response initiated by a ‘gossip columnist and
socialite’ called Pebbles Hooper.
Whatever criticism I might have about a mother burdening her children
with Google-whacking names that look like a bad Scrabble or Lexicon hand,
Jetejura and Telyshaun (or Teiyzshwaun – the press couldn’t make their minds up),
it was tempered by a woman named after an eternal baby from a 1960s cartoon
that did more to place dinosaurs coexisting with humans than weird Christian thinking
ever could.
Hooper illiterately tweeted that this was
‘natural selection’. This laconic
off-the-cuff remark was well grounded.
The George accident was a candidate for the Darwin Awards, ‘chlorinating
the gene pool’ as the Awards site says, and one needed to balance the sex ratio
favouring men 89% to women’s 11%. That
three young children sadly lost their lives by the actions of a mother whose
prime purpose was to protect them will likely mean George won’t make it to the
finals. This, at least for those who
knew them, is what turns farce into tragedy and Hooper’s tweet from joke into cruel insensitivity.
Response to Hooper’s tweet was as quick as
it was condemnatory and forced her resignation.
Yet only a few years ago an event like the George’s would have raised a
brief flurry of slightly off-colour jokes via word of mouth or email that
Hooper’s comment would have formed part of.
But no longer. What has changed?
For
this we need to consider societal changes generated by the political Left. It had achieved many of its goals but was atomised
by the libertarian Right’s attack on unions and its transfer of wealth from the
Nation State to a new and detached oligarchy.
Bereft of its Fabian roots and unable to escape the new governmental paradigm
created by economic liberalism the Left had no alternative but to reposition
itself.
It
did this by creating a whole new class, not of workers, but of victims.
And
therein lies a whole new essay.
No comments:
Post a Comment